Mohr-Weil Lumber Co. v. Russell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Exceptions to -auditor’s report. Before Judge Smith.. Wilcox superior court. June 29, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
A motion was made to dismiss the present-writ of error, on the ground that Messrs. Cutts & Lawson were-not made parties to nor served with the bill of exceptions. This motion was not well taken. Our views upon it and upon the question therewith closely connected, viz., whether or not-that portion of the judgment now under review allowing these attorneys a fee of $1,500 was erroneous, will be given immediately after stating the facts of this case; but, as will be perceived, the particular facts pertaining to the two matters just referred to, for the obvious reason that it would have been very…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mason v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Atlas Tack Co. v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Barksdale v. BunkleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Moss v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Mendenhall v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.