Legal Opinion

City of Cedartown v. Pickett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1942No. 14264PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The defendant in error moved to dismiss the writ of .error, on the ground that the ease is still pending in the court below, no final judgment having been rendered therein, and that the bill of exceptions is premature, because the judgment excepted to is not a final judgment. Cited in support of this motion is 50 U. S. C. A. § 582, as follows: “Any interlocutory order made by any court under the provisions of this act may, upon the court’s own motion or otherwise, be revoked, modified, or extended by it upon such notice to the parties affected as it may require.” Also cited…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Realty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Montgomery v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ware v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Moulder v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Millholland v. OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Levine v. LevineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Jernigan v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API