City of Ardmore v. Roedler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
Jane Roedler (plaintiff) instituted this action against the City of Ardmore (de*693fendant) to recover damages because of expenses, loss of earning capacity and physical and mental pain and suffering resulting from personal injuries received as a result of a fall caused by a defect or hole or depression present in a city sidewalk due to negligence of defendant. The answer of the defendant was a general denial.
The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $2,000. Defendant has appealed to this court.
The evidence is that plaintiff is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma City v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Hartshorne v. CarlomangoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- City of Okmulgee v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hillcrest Medical Center v. WierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Cox v. HalbigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963