Legal Opinion

City of Ardmore v. Roedler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1961No. 39042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

Jane Roedler (plaintiff) instituted this action against the City of Ardmore (de*693fendant) to recover damages because of expenses, loss of earning capacity and physical and mental pain and suffering resulting from personal injuries received as a result of a fall caused by a defect or hole or depression present in a city sidewalk due to negligence of defendant. The answer of the defendant was a general denial.

The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $2,000. Defendant has appealed to this court.

The evidence is that plaintiff is a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Oklahoma City v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. City of Hartshorne v. CarlomangoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. City of Okmulgee v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hillcrest Medical Center v. WierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Cox v. HalbigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API