Legal Opinion
Cano v. Glover
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 2006No. B187267PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Ronald Glover (defendant) appeals from an order denying his motion for dismissal with prejudice. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 581d, 581, subd. (f)(2).) He brought the motion after a demurrer was sustained and Luis Cano (plaintiff) did not name him in the fourth amended complaint. The trial court dismissed the action as to defendant, but without prejudice. The court also denied his motion for costs and attorney’s fees on the ground that the motions were “premature.” We reverse.
Procedural History
On July 25, 2004, plaintiff sued William Tucker and defendant for breach of contract, common…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Reynolds v. BementCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hoffman v. SMITHWOODS RV PARK, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bernard v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Marlene Penrod v. Americredit Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Mon Chong Loong Trading Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kruss v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.