Legal Opinion

Cape Co. v. Wiebe

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1976No. 40379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

This is an action for an injunction to enjoin the defendant John A. Wiebe, Trustee, from interfering with an access road and utility lines serving plaintiff’s property. Interests of Kirkham-Michael, Inc., and Sears, Roebuck & Co. are also in issue. Judgment was generally against the defendant and in favor of plaintiff and other parties. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Kirkham-Michael, Inc., hereinafter referred to as K-M, was the owner of a tract of approximately 10 acres. A Sears, Roebuck & Co. store, hereinafter referred to as Sears, was constructed on a portion of this tract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bend v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Campbell v. GallentineNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Dewey v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Satterfield v. DunneNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Johnson v. HesserNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Omega Chemical Co., Inc. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Millard Rural Fire Protection District No. 1 v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bonsall v. SterrettNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API