Legal Opinion

Garrett v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 5, 2007No. 07-225 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*669 OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Mot.), plaintiffs Response to [Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss] (Plaintiffs Response or PL’s Resp.), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Defendant’s Reply or Def.’s Reply).

I. Background

Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Def.’s Mot. 1. Defendant argues that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the case and that plaintiff…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on MotionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dacosta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Gulan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. Jaye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API