Legal Opinion
King v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 15, 2008No. 07-589 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Motion), Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (plaintiffs’ Response or Pis.’ Resp.), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (defendant’s Reply or Def.’s Reply).
Plaintiffs, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Police Officers nationwide, filed a complaint with this court on August 2, 2007, alleging that the United States failed to increase their salaries as required by section 540C of title 28…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Mendoza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.