Legal Opinion
Colorado River Indian Tribes v. National Indian Gaming Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 24, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-0010(JDB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Colorado River Indian Tribes (“Colorado River” or “the tribe”) is a federally-recognized Indian Tribe that operates a casino on its tribal lands in Parker, Arizona. The casino conducts what is known as Class III gaming, which includes most conventional forms of casino gaming, such as slot machines, roulette, and blackjack. On January 10, 2001, the tribe interrupted the National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC” or “Commission”) as it was conducting an audit of the casino to assess the tribe’s compliance with the Commission’s minimum internal…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colorado River Indian Tribes v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- National Association of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. United States Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Pueblo of Santa Ana v. NashDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.