Stockman v. Loeser
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James B Cullison, Judge. Action by Erederike Stockman against.Otto Loeser and five other defendants to recover possession of an undivided interest in real estate and for rents and profits and for partition. Judgment decreeing Otto, Fred, God-frey, and Wilhelm Loeser to be the owners of the property and denying their oodefend-ants, Minnie Christensen and Frank Loeser, and the plaintiff any of the relief prayed for.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James B Cullison, Judge. Action by Erederike Stockman against.Otto Loeser and five other defendants to recover possession of an undivided interest in real estate and for rents and profits and for partition. Judgment decreeing Otto, Fred, God-frey, and Wilhelm Loeser to be the owners of the property and denying their oodefend-ants, Minnie Christensen and Frank Loeser, and the plaintiff any of the relief prayed for. Plaintiff Friederike Stockman and defendants Minnie Christensen and Frank Loeser appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Alfalfa county by Friederike Stockman, as plaintiff, against Minnie Christensen, Wilhelm Loeser, Frank Loeser, Fred Loeser, Otto Loeser, and God-frey Loeser, for the purpose of partitioning the northeast quarter of section 15, in township 28 north of range 10,. W. I. M., in Alfalfa county, Oklahoma. The original petition was afterwards amended,' answers filed by different defendants and replies filed by the plaintiff. There were numerous amended answers and replies filed, demurrers and mo tions sustained, and the case was tried to the court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Connelly v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cates v. MilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turner v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Templeman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Tate v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936