Carr v. Woodbury County Juvenile Detention Center
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING PLAINTIFF CARR’S MOTION IN LIMINE
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. BACKGROUND AND MOTION.620
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS.621
A. The McKennon Decision.622
B. Applicability Of McKennon.626
1. Decisions of other courts on “after after-acquired evidence”.•..626
2. McKennon’s applicability here .627
a. “After after-acquired evidence” is outside the scope of McKennon.627
b. McKennon’s prerequisite has not been met.629
C. Relevance and Balance Of Probative Value And Unfair Prejudice.630
IV. CONCLUSION.630
In a recent ruling, McKennon v. Nashville Banner Pub. Co., — U.S. -, 115…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- V. Ray Summers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anaeme v. Diagnostek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Wendi Ferguson Sellers v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- McKenna v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Deer v. Cherokee CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Wendi F. Sellers v. Norman Y. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.