Legal Opinion
Anaeme v. Diagnostek, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1999No. 97-2102PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
In June 1995, Plaintiff Chibu Anaeme brought an action against Defendants Diag-nostek, Inc., Health Care Services, and HPI in which he claimed disparate treatment and disparate impact under Title VII and racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. This case stems from Plaintiffs alleged submission to Defendants of approximately sixty employment applications for a staff pharmacist position between 1991 and 1994. Plaintiff received his Bachelor’s of Science degree in Pharmacy from the University of New Mexico in 1986 and became a licensed pharmacist in New Mexico in 1989.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Perry v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Deters v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Bucalo v. Shelter Island Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.