Legal Opinion
Boomer v. Abbett
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1953No. Civ. 15408PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Defendant, George W. Abbett, entered into a contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation to construct a transmission line in Northern California. Plaintiffs H. H. Boomer, Jr., and S. C. Giles, a copartnership, entered into a subcontract with defendant to perform the excavation for and installation of the transmission line towers, and certain other work, called for by the prime contract. The bureau, purporting to act under the terms of the prime contract, issued a change order that affected the method and amount of excavation on 1 mile out of the total of 25 miles of the transmission…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Edwards v. CurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- United States v. HeatonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1961
- Boomer v. AbbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- United States ex rel. T. M. Page Corp. v. HenslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954