Tucker v. . Eatough
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, O. J.
In the summons, the sheriff was commanded “to summon Henry Eatough and Henry Eatough as agent and organizer of and representing the members of the United Textile Workers of America, an unincorporated association, defendants in the above action.” If the “United Textile Workers of America” had been a corporation the service would have been invalid, C. S., 483 (1), and the action should have been dismissed as to them by.the judge ex mero motu. As the summons recites that they are unincorporated, for a still stronger reason the summons should have been dismissed. In either event the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Garrison v. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Abbott Ex Rel. Abbott v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Nelson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. Relief DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Ball-Thrash & Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Operative Plasterers' & Cement Finishers' International Ass'n v. CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Stafford v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Youngblood v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Ionic Lodge 72 F. & A. A. M. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.