Legal Opinion

Youngblood v. Bright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1956No. 97PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

A voluntary appearance whereby a defendant obtains an extension of time in which to plead, is a general appearance. Wilson v. Thaggard, and Stone v. Thaggard, 225 N.C. 348, 34 S.E. 2d 140, and cases cited. “A general appearance waives any defects in the jurisdiction of the court for want of valid summons or of proper service thereof.” Winborne, J., in In re Blalock, 233 N.C. 493, 504, 64 S.E. 2d 848. Defendant Union, by its general appearance, has waived any irregularity in or lack of service of process.

True, the Act of 1951 (ch. 245, Session Laws of 1951), now codified as G.S. 1-134.1,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Tucker v. . EatoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Stafford v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Citizens Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Owens v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Alexiou v. O.R.I.P., Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API