Legal Opinion

Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1950No. 90PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The chief inquiry presented by the appeal is whether the evidence of the plaintiffs is legally sufficient to take the case to the jury and to support a verdict in their favor. Ballard v. Ballard, 230 N.C. 629, 55 S.E. 2d 316.

Since the code of the Grand Lodge did not undertake to impose any restraint upon the alienability of the property of Venus Lodge or its members so long as Venus Lodge was an active subordinate lodge, and since there has never been any “suspension or demise” of Venus Lodge, the Grand Lodge has never had any semblance of claim to the property in suit, and is without…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Murray, Ferris & Co. v. BlackledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  5. Walker v. Miller.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Crane v. CraneUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jones v. Alpine Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted, Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Stafford v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API