Legal Opinion
Bearden v. Honeywell International Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided June 14, 2010No. 3:09-01035PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendant’s Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 27), the plaintiffs’ response (Docket No. 33), and the defendant’s reply (Docket No. 36). For the reasons discussed below, the defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This is the defendant’s second combined Motion to Strike and Motion to Dismiss. The court previously dismissed a number of the plaintiffs’ claims and struck certain class action allegations, after which the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Rosa v. American Water Heater Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Brown v. Woodbury Auto Group LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Brown v. Woodbury Auto Group LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Buncombe County, North Carolina v. Team Health Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.