Legal Opinion
O'Malley v. NaphCare, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 17, 2014No. Case No. 3:12-cv-326PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART THE PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANT NAPHCARE, INC. (DOC. # 42); ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #52); OVERRULING THE DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS (DOC. # 53) TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING; AND DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE THE FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION CLAIM UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983, COUNT FOUR OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #41)
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Teresa L. O’Malley (“O’Malley” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action against her former…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Seidel v. KirbyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017