Legal Opinion

State v. Wigglesworth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 14, 1991No. 89C-21174, 89C-21173; CA A65821, A65876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants were found guilty of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, ORS 161.450, delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4).1 At sentencing, the trial court merged the delivery charge into the conspiracy charge in each case and imposed separate concurrent sentences on the charges of conspiracy and possession.

Defendants contend that they cannot be sentenced separately for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance and for possession of the same controlled substance. The state concedes that, because it cannot be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Vernell Wigglesworth v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API