Legal Opinion
United States v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1997No. 96-1338PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us on Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The government seeks to bring an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s denial of its motion to reconsider the dismissal of two overt acts from one count in a multi-count indictment brought against Defendants under the Clean Air Act and the False Statements Act. 1 The government contends that we have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under the Criminal Appeals Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3731. We determine that we lack jurisdiction under § 3731 and grant Defendants’ motion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edwards v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Rogelio Saenz-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.