Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Valdez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1986No. Nos. 85-1552, 85-1650PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the interplay between two welfare programs: social security and unemployment compensation. Plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants (plaintiffs) are three residents of Colorado who retired and began to receive social security payments. Each plaintiff returned to work for a new employer, subsequently became unemployed, and filed unemployment insurance claims with defendants-appellants/cross-ap-pellees (defendants). Based on an interpretation of the pension offset provision of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), 26 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(15), and a similar…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Talley v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- City of Ouray v. OlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Ewing v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.