Legal Opinion
Meadow v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 9, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court from a finding and award of the compensation commissioner denying his claim for compensation and filed a separate appeal from the refusal of the commissioner to open the award. In the record it appears that on a stipulation of the parties and by consent of court the appeals were consolidated, and the court affirmed the award of the commissioner and his denial of the motion to open. The plaintiff appealed to this court. In the interest of accuracy and simplicity of procedure, we point out that two appeals were unnecessary. The motion to open the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Gonirenki v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- State v. GoldbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Gosek v. Garmer and Stiles CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Tutsky v. YMCA of GreenwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Walter v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- D'ANGELO v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.