Legal Opinion
Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. Armbruster
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 910PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action is to recover the death benefit under an accident insurance policy.
This is the third appeal. Former decisions appear in Benefit Ass’n of Ry. Employees v. Armbruster, 217 Ala. 282, 116 So. 164, 166, and Benefit Ass’n of Ry. Employees v. Armbruster, 221 Ala. 399, 129 So. 78.
Dealing with questions raised on the present appeal in the order presented in appellant’s brief, we are asked to depart from our former holdings sustaining the refusal of the affirmative charge requested by defendant.
As pointed out on first appeal, supra, the policy insures against “loss resulting directly and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Standard Acc. Ins. of Detroit v. HoehnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. SchlatterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- White v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. GratiotWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.