Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. Armbruster
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action is to recover the death benefit under an accident insurance, policy.
On former appeal, the law of' the case made by the tendencies of plaintiff’s evidence was fully considered and declared. We adhere to what is there said without repetition. Benefit Ass’n of Railway Employees v. Armbruster, 217 Ala. 282, 116 So. 164.
The insured was suffering from an acute attack of appendicitis; was under treatment of Dr. Cocciola. On calling in Tlr. Torrence, a consulting surgeon, it was decided to remove him from his home in Birmingham to Nor-wood Hospital for observation and probable operation.
Pla…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Knote v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Pride v. Inter-State Business Men's Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Alverson v. Little Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prudential Ins. Co. v. CalvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Hudson v. StriplingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Gray v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Thompson Tractor Company v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.