Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. Armbruster
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This is a suit upon an accident policy of insurance, and the code form of complaint on life insurance policies (form 12) does not apply. Gilliland v. Order of R. R. Conductors, 216 Ala. 13, 112 So. 225. This case was tried upon count A alone, and, while said count avers that the death and accident occurred “during the life of the policy,” this is a mere conclusion as no facts are set forth showing such a compliance with the terms of the contract on the part of the insured as to render it in force at the time of the accident, resulting* in death, and the trial court erred in not sus-. taining…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. HannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Standard Acc. Ins. of Detroit v. HoehnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Gilliland v. Order of Ry. Conductors of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. GratiotWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Emergency Aid Insurance Co. v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.