Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 44PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is upon a policy of accident insurance; more specifically upon the “Special Provisions” of a life policy providing “Double Indemnity” in case of death “in consequence of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means * * * and as the direct result thereof independent of all other causes.”

Another .clause stipulates that such agreement shall not cover death from engaging in certain hazardous occupations, etc., “or death resulting directly or indirectly from bodily or mental infirmity, ptomaines, or bacterial infections ■ other than infection occurring…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. National Masonic Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Union Central Life Insurance Company v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API