Pennsylvania Prison Society v. Rendell
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 82) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 84). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a).
BACKGROUND
On October 16, 1997, Plaintiffs filed a petition for review in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, challenging the legality of a ballot question…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pa Prison Society v. CortesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Inmates of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. CorbettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007