Legal Opinion

Sandi Rush v. Sport Chalet, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2015No. 12-57253PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOTZ, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiff Sandi Rush appeals the district court’s sua sponte order that dismissed Defendants ’Petsmart, Inc.; Sport Chalet, Inc.; and Foothill Ranch, LLC (collectively “defendants”) after holding that they were improperly joined. We reverse the district court’s legal conclusion under Rule 20 as to Foothill Ranch. We also vacate its decision to dismiss rather than sever the retail defendants and remand with instructions.

I

Rush is wheelchair-bound and “physically disabled” under applicable federal and California law. She alleges she encountered physical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mark F. Elmore v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. DirecTV, Inc. v. LetoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Corley v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Adriana Holt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Christopher Mendoza v. NordstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Bojorquez v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  5. (PC) Ardds v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API