Legal Opinion

Christopher Mendoza v. Nordstrom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2017No. 12-57130, 12-57144PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Christopher Mendoza and Plaintiff-Intervenor Meagan Gordon (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) claims against Defendant Nordstrom, Inc., alleging violations of California’s “day of rest” law. In an earlier order, we certified three questions of state law to the California Supreme Court. Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., 778 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 2015) (order). The California Supreme Court accepted certification and answered our questions. Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., 2…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Clyde Spencer v. Sharon KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Angele Suzanne Cox v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  2. Camacho v. CNMI Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2019
  3. Carlos Arteaga v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
  5. Healy v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API