Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Broadmoor Development Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1979No. 40898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Stephen Arnold appeals from an order granting the motion of defendant-respondent Broadmoor Development Co. for summary judgment on Ar*565nold’s claim for specific performance of a real estate contract. The denouement of the case turns on the issue of whether Arnold’s action is barred by the statute of frauds, § 432.010, RSMo 1969. We find that the action is so barred and affirm the summary judgment in favor of Broadmoor.

According to the record, Broadmoor was engaged in the business of selling condominiums. Arnold executed a form real estate sales contract to buy a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aurora Water Co. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Blue Valley Creamery Co. v. Consolidated Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Thompson v. New South Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. State v. MuellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Alonzo v. LaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mayer v. King Cola Mid-America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Vess Beverages, Inc. v. The Paddington Corp. And Morgan Furze, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Crawford v. DetringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Gillespie v. PulsiferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Doss & Harper Stone Co. v. Hoover Bros. Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API