Gillespie v. Pulsifer
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Judge.
The main question in the appeal before us is the sufficiency of certain signed writings to satisfy the statute of frauds requirement that a contract for the sale of real estate shall be “in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith.” § 432.010, RSMo 1978.
Upon evidence which we shall hereafter describe, the trial court granted a summary judgment in the defendant seller’s favor upon the petition of the buyer for specific performance of the alleged contract.
We hold that the court ruled correctly and that as a matter of law the contract was unenforceable because not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edwards v. HeidelbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ringer v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shellabarger v. ShellabargerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Piazza v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Johnson v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- James W. Smith v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Shafer v. Western Holding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.