Legal Opinion

Alonzo v. Laubert

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1967No. 51888PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES A. MOORE, Special Judge.

Plaintiffs, respondents here, alleged in their “bill in equity” that each of them was entitled to a one-sixth interest in a described parcel of realty in the City of St. Louis by reason of an oral agreement with their sister Margaret Laubert and prayed specific performance. Margaret’s husband, Forrest, was joined as a defendant because of a subsequent and allegedly fraudulent conveyance creating an estate by the entirety. Defendants denied the agreement and invoked the statute of frauds.

Following trial to the court, a decree was entered which included findings of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Austin & Bass Builders, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Scheerer v. ScheererSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Thompson v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Willey v. TalkingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holtmeier v. DayaniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In Re Estate of LooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Koman v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Bayless Building Materials Co. v. Peerless Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Piazza v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API