Legal Opinion

People v. Foreman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 1998No. 98SA261PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the grievance committee approved the stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct entered into between the respondent, Deborah Hope Foreman, and the complainant. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended discipline in a range of public censure to a sixty-day suspension from the practice of law for entering into a prohibited business transaction with a client. In approving the conditional admission, the inquiry panel recommended the sixty-day suspension. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation, and order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ZiankovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. People v. CasiasSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. People v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. People v. CulterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. HydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API