Legal Opinion

State v. Faron Raymond Hawkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2013No. 38532PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This is a permissive interlocutory appeal from the district court’s determination that the law of the case doctrine prohibited it from making a retroactive determination of Faron Hawkins’s mental competency when he stood trial in January 2008.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In January 2008, a jury convicted Faron Hawkins of two counts of robbery. He appealed his conviction and the Idaho Court of Appeals issued a decision on December 30, 2009, vacating the conviction and remanding the matter for a new trial. The Court of Appeals determined that the district court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. James Richard Odle v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. AryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. Russell James ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Berrett v. Clark County School DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. HuntleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Alcala v. Verbruggen Palletizing Solutions, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. Faron Raymond HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API