State v. Faron Raymond Hawkins
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON THE BRIEFS
HORTON, Justice.
Faron Hawkins appeals from his 2008 conviction for two counts of robbery. Hawkins argues that the district court’s 2010 retroactive determination that he was competent to stand trial in 2008 violated his due process rights. He also argues that he was not competent to waive his right to counsel and represent himself pro se. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In January of 2008, a jury convicted Hawkins of two counts of robbery. At trial, Hawkins admitted that he robbed banks but claimed that he did so under duress that stemmed from his previous…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pieniazek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
- Hawkins v. Warden ValleyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025
- State v. Faron Raymond HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. IngrahamIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. IngrahamIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.