Legal Opinion

State v. Russell James Parker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2014No. 38956PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIS IS A SUBSTITUTE OPINION.

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED APRIL 4, 2014 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

2Per curiam

I. Nature of the Case

The State charged Russell J. Parker with one count of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor under sixteen. Parker went to trial and the jury found Parker guilty as charged. Parker appeals his conviction to this Court. He argues that the district court erred in admitting statements made by law enforcement during an interview with him. He also argues that the State engaged in five instances of prosecutorial misconduct, each satisfying the fundamental error standard. He further…

3Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. HerreraIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API