Legal Opinion

People v. Ary

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2011No. S173309PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*513Opinion

KENNARD, Acting C. J.

A state that puts a mentally incompetent criminal defendant on trial violates the due process clause of the federal Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment. This constitutional provision also requires that, whenever the evidence raises a reasonable doubt about a defendant’s mental competence, a hearing be held in the trial court to assess the defendant’s mental state. Here, on defendant’s appeal from a murder conviction, the Court of Appeal held in its first opinion in these proceedings that the trial court had erred in failing to evaluate evidence of defendant’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API