People v. Ary
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*513Opinion
KENNARD, Acting C. J.
A state that puts a mentally incompetent criminal defendant on trial violates the due process clause of the federal Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment. This constitutional provision also requires that, whenever the evidence raises a reasonable doubt about a defendant’s mental competence, a hearing be held in the trial court to assess the defendant’s mental state. Here, on defendant’s appeal from a murder conviction, the Court of Appeal held in its first opinion in these proceedings that the trial court had erred in failing to evaluate evidence of defendant’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.