Legal Opinion

Dear v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY,1 Judge.

This ease is before us on counsel’s petition to withdraw from his representation of Phi-nas Dear, Jr. (Dear), who appeals from a denial of administrative relief by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) recommitting him as technical parole violator. We affirm.

Dear was originally sentenced to ten-to-twenty-one years imprisonment for rape and robbery. His minimum term expiration date was November 5, 1981, and the maximum date was November 5, 2002. Dear was paroled on November 5, 1991, but was recommitted as a technical parole violator on December 18, 1992. On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Craig v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Wesley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Frankhouser v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Goods v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Richardson v. Pennsylvania Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Stroud v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Pometti v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API