Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1944No. Civ. No. 3110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action for reformation of a contract. The contract sought to be reformed was entered into by and between the plaintiff W. G. Bradford and the defendant. Southern California Petroleum Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Southern.” The plaintiff Johanna Bradford is the wife of W. G. Bradford. The plaintiff Republic Petroleum Company, hereinafter referred to as “Republic” is the successor in interest of the plaintiffs W. G. Bradford and Johanna Bradford. The defendant General Petroleum Corporation of California (hereinafter referred to as “General”) is the assignee, with respect…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chichester v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Treat v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. CurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Meyer v. Great Western InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosland v. ConstantineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Chamberlain v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Petersen v. DynesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Ayers v. FCA US, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API