Mirich v. State

RAPER, Chief Justice.

The appellant-defendant appeals from the judgment and sentence of the district court finding him guilty of burglary in violation of § 6-129, W.S.1957, now § 6-7-201, W.S.1977. 1 He asserts as errors: “No evidence was presented [at trial] to establish an intent to steal”, and the district court’s failure “to instruct on the relationship of the evidence to a lesser offense increased the significance of the lack of evidence of intent to steal.”

We shall affirm.

The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We approach this assertion of error in light of our…