Legal Opinion

Stuebgen v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1976No. 4325PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON REARGUMENT

ARMSTRONG, District Judge, Retired.

Appellants were each charged separately, but tried together before a jury in Platte County, Wyoming, convicted and jointly appeal on charges of unlawfully and felo-niously having in their possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, marihuana. The issues here are:

1. Were defendants deprived of their rights to speedy trial ?

2. Was the specific intent instruction erroneous ?

We answer both questions affirmatively.

On March 19, 1972 the defendants were stopped by a highway patrolman for driving a car with only one Colorado license…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cullin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API