Legal Opinion
Intex Recreation Corporation v. Team Worldwide Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2004-1785PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation (“Intex”) seeks an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. That statute authorizes courts to award attorneys’ fees in “exceptional cases.” Specifically, Intex requests all fees and costs incurred since November 1, 2013 — the date Team Worldwide Corporation (“TWW”) insisted on proceeding to summary judgment despite having received an adverse claim construction. 1 TWW maintains that its summary judgment arguments were not meritless and ■that this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Gharb v. Mitsubishi Electric CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.