Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Greenberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $30.68, balance due upon a shipment of scrap iron. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Boerner, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In November, 1909, defendant, doing business under the name of Greenberg Iron & Metal Company,' purchased from J. Applebaum at Cogswell, North Dakota, three carloads of scrap iron to be delivered f. o. b. in St. Paul, Minnesota. The iron was delivered by J. Applebaum to plaintiff, a common carrier of interstate commerce, at Cogswell for shipment to defendant at St. Paul. Plaintiff issued its bill of lading, naming 'defendant as consignee, but erroneously stating the freight charge to be $166.26, whereas by the duly published schedule rate the amount was $196.94. . The defendant accepted the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Union Pac. R. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Johnson v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- American Railway Express Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Froslee v. SonjuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Montpelier & Wells River Railroad v. BianchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.