Montpelier & Wells River Railroad v. Bianchi
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action op Contract to recover the balance of certain freight charges. Tried by Montpelier City Court, Erwin M. Harvey, Judge, on an agreed statement of facts. Judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
This case was heard below on an agreed statement of facts, judgment was for the defendants, and the case is here on plaintiff’s exception to the judgment.
The material facts in the case are these: The defendants, who are granite manufacturers located in the city of Barre, sometime prior to March 12, 1915, entered into a contract with Matthew & Mather, of Norfolk, Nebraska, to manufacture for the latter certain granite monuments to be delivered f. o. b. City of Barre. The defendants delivered these monuments to the plaintiff, loaded on cars furnished by it, at the City of Barre, *83March 12, 1915,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. HefleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. New Albany Box & Basket Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- American Railway Express Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- New York Central Railroad v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Oregon Growers Co-Operative Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Montpelier & Wells River R. R. v. Caldbeck-Cosgrove Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939