Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Schmit
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover the difference between the lawful freight charges on an interstate shipment and the charges paid by the defendant. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendants appeal.
The , case was tried on stipulated facts, not a part of the record, upon which the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law directing judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the undercharge. If the judgment can be sustained on any reasonable interpretation of the facts found it must be affirmed.
The' plaintiff was the carrier from Des Moines, Iowa, to points in Minnesota. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Union Pac. R. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Case v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. E. Bernier & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
- Davis v. AslesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925