Legal Opinion

United States v. Various Gambling Devices, A. B. Fort, Claimant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1973No. 72-2359PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

Claimant A. B. Fort appeals from a judgment forfeiting to the Government thirty-one pinball machines as gambling devices possessed by claimant in 1970 and 1971, when he was not registered under the Gambling Devices Act of 1962. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1171-1178.

Claimant’s specifications of error present three issues for review: (1) Was the forfeiture of the machines consistent with the Due Process guarantee of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution? (2) Were the ten machines manufactured prior to the effective date of the Gambling Devices Act of 1962 subject to forfeiture under…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. John M. Haydel, Jr., A/K/A "Ice Cream" and "Mugsy"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Andrew J. WelebirCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Roy Charles SpachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. SchmeetsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API