United States v. John M. Haydel, Jr., A/K/A "Ice Cream" and "Mugsy"
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
The validity of John Haydel’s conviction for materially underreporting his gross wagering income for purposes of the wagering excise tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), turns on the constitutionality of the government’s seizure of his gambling records, for it was primarily by their introduction that he was convicted. The seizure is challenged as having been made beyond the premises described on the warrant and as violating Haydel’s rights against self-incrimination. Because we find that the search and seizure met constitutional requirements, we affirm the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- State v. OodyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. George WuagneuxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Josephs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.