Legal Opinion
Ross v. Medical Univ. of South Carolina
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 22, 1997No. 24694PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
Appellant Paul Ross, M.D., seeks judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act (the APA) 1 of the termination of his tenured position by Respondent Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). Dr. Ross contends multiple and overlapping errors at all levels in the process of his termination resulted in denial of his procedural due process rights in violation of the United States and South Carolina Constitutions. 2 The circuit court affirmed the termination. We affirm as modified.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Dr. Ross was a tenured professor at MUSC. In 1989, his employment was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McKinney v. PateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Dale Schaper v. City of Huntsville, Gene Pipes and Hank EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re JLD Properties of St. Albans, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Greenville County Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.