Legal Opinion

Grayson v. Carter Rhoad Furniture

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1995No. 24193PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waller, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision reported at 312 S.C. 250, 439 S.E. (2d) 859 (Ct. App. 1993). We affirm as modified.

FACTS

This is a worker’s compensation case. Jarvis Grayson was employed as a furniture mover for Petitioner, Carter Rhoad Furniture. He injured his back on August 23,1990 while moving a sofa with a co-worker. Grayson continued to work for several weeks but, by October 9,1990, he was unable to work due to back pain. Grayson remained out of work for several weeks, for which Carter Rhoad paid him temporary total disability benefits. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Jenkins v. MearesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Hoxit v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Anderson v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Mullinax v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Medlin v. Upstate Plaster ServiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API