Legal Opinion

Innophos, Inc. v. Rhodia, S.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 2007PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered June 14, 2005, which, in an action for breach of contract, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment declaring that certain claims asserted against plaintiff constitute taxes as defined in the parties’ agreement and that any guarantee required to contest these claims is defendants’ responsibility, affirmed, without costs.

In August 1994, plaintiff Innophos paid more than $530 million to acquire Rhodia Fosfatados and other specialty phosphate businesses from defendants. The purchase and sale agreement requires…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. New York City Off-Track Betting Corp. v. Safe Factory Outlet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Riverside South Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell RiversideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Innophos, Inc. v. RHODIA, SANew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Macy's Inc. v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Banco Espírito Santo, S.A. v. Concessionária Do Rodoanel Oeste S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Hughes Communications India Private Limited v. the DirecTV Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API