Legal Opinion
Innophos, Inc. v. RHODIA, SA
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 2008PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ClPARICK, J.
Defendants are a group of related companies that were in the business of producing and selling phosphate products from various locations in Canada, Mexico and the U.S. In early 2004, an agency of the Government of Mexico, the Comisión Nacional del Agua (National Water Commission [CNA]), began an audit of the water usage of defendants’ operation in Mexico—Rhodia Fosfatados de Mexico, S.A. de C.V In March 2004, the CNA sent a letter to Rhodia Fosfatados’s legal representative in Mexico that advised the company of the audit and requested information and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Innophos, Inc. v. Rhodia, S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bank of New York v. First Millennium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- MHR Capital Partners LP v. Presstek, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Brad H. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Riverside South Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell RiversideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Macy's Inc. v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.